Days of Judgment
After six days of evidence and argument in a negligence case he’d heard in Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, it was time for Judge Garry Neilson to reveal his decision. So in his Sydney courtroom, he read it aloud. And read it. And read it some more. It took him 17 hours over four days to deliver his opinion — and it wasn’t until the third day that he revealed who’d won: the plaintiff, who’d been thrown from a horse when a car drove by. The equestrian’s victory was short-lived, however: an appeals court not only criticized Judge Neilson for giving his lengthy opinion orally instead of just in writing, it reversed his decision. (AC/Sydney Morning Herald) ...Maybe if they’d heard his reasons in person, the appellate judges would have been more convinced.Original Publication Date: 23 April 2017
This story is in True’s book collections, in Volume 23.
This story is in True’s book collections, in Volume 23.
Is There a Problem on This Page? Let Me Know using the Help button lower right, and thanks.
I believe humanity is held back by the lack of thinking. I provoke thought with examples of what happens when we don’t think, and when we do. This is True is my primary method: stories like this come out every week by email, and basic subscriptions are free. Click here for a subscribe form.
Previous: Like Mother, Like Daughter