Story Archive

Drug Court

Criminal-defense lawyer John David Moore Jr. thinks the disappearance of evidence means his client should go free, or at least be tried again. It’s not that the opioid pills never made it to the jury; it’s that they weren’t still there after the jury went home. Did the pills go home with a juror? The Franklin County, Ohio, sheriff’s office is investigating, but a prosecutor said jurors may have left the evidence unmonitored during breaks, in a jury room off a hallway where court personnel, lawyers, and law enforcement roam. “And no matter what happens,” said prosecutor Ron O’Brien, “it shouldn’t affect the fact that the evidence showed that [Moore’s client] possessed the drugs” when he was arrested. The defendant was convicted of possessing various drugs — including heroin and meth that did not disappear. (AC/Columbus Dispatch) ...“They didn’t take the heroin?” said the defendant. “Definitely not my peers.”
Original Publication Date: 13 August 2017
This story is in True’s book collections, in Volume 24.

Is There a Problem on This Page? Let Me Know using the Help button lower right, and thanks.

I believe humanity is held back by the lack of thinking. I provoke thought with examples of what happens when we don’t think, and when we do. This is True is my primary method: stories like this come out every week by email, and basic subscriptions are free. Click here for a subscribe form.


Search for:

Category: