What Do You Mean by “Ridiculous Lawsuits by Inmates”?
When Jesse Dimmick was a fugitive from Colorado fleeing a murder charge, he led police in Kansas on a chase, and his car was disabled in front of a newlywed couple’s house. He ran in and confronted the couple, Jared and Lindsay Rowley, at knifepoint. As police surrounded the house, Dimmick says he got a verbal agreement from the couple that they would help him escape in exchange for an unspecified cash payment, which he says constituted “a legally binding oral contract.” But when he fell asleep, the Rowleys fled the house and police stormed in, shooting and wounding Dimmick. He was convicted of multiple felonies in the case, but after his sentencing (10 years, 11 months), Dimmick was extradited to Colorado to face the murder charge. In his free time while awaiting trial in that case, Dimmick has sued the Rowleys “without the aid of proffessional [sic] legal counsel,” his claim notes, alleging “breech [sic] of contract” and demanding $235,000 in compensation. The Rowleys’ attorney asked for a dismissal of the suit, but the judge has yet to rule on that motion. (RC/Topeka Capital-Journal) ...The law has this backwards. Inmates shouldn’t be allowed to file such suits without the judge’s permission.Original Publication Date: 04 December 2011
This story is in True’s book collections, in Volume 18.
This story is in True’s book collections, in Volume 18.
Is There a Problem on This Page? Let Me Know using the Help button lower right, and thanks.
I believe humanity is held back by the lack of thinking. I provoke thought with examples of what happens when we don’t think, and when we do. This is True is my primary method: stories like this come out every week by email, and basic subscriptions are free. Click here for a subscribe form.
Previous: But It’s Not Even For Me!