I ran more “zero tolerance” stories last week, and I’m noticing a new trend: when I run the stories, I get mail from readers asking what they can do about this trend, since it obviously is a trend and not just an isolated happening. The new trend: many ask if I would please provide the mail/email address of the schools involved so you can give the administrators a piece of your mind.
No!
I do not think that will help. Sure, it’s fun to abuse idiots, but the point is to get this kind of thing stopped. Besides: schools often have no choice: it’s often a law they are following, not just school policy. Don’t abuse the people who have no choice, abuse the people that made the law!
Yes:
So what can you do? Write letters — not to the schools, but to the school boards, state education officials, state legislators, and your Congressional representatives. You will likely be rebuffed at first, but the more letters they get, the more they will understand that something needs to be done.
FirstGov has links to most U.S. government web sites if you need contact info. There’s a non-government site for finding contact information for state and local government agencies. Outside the U.S. (and indeed ZT is spreading outside the U.S.), look for government contact info here.
Why do I say you’ll probably be rebuffed? True has been pounding on this issue so long, I’m now not the only columnist ragging on it. Another is the Washington Post’s Marc Fisher. In his most recent ZT rant, he notes that two members of Virginia’s House of Delegates — a Republican and a Democrat, showing this is not a partisan issue — introduced bills to bring common sense to school discipline. Both were soundly defeated.
But There’s More: Fisher goes on to tell the story of a Virginia boy who took a knife away from a friend who was suicidal. The boy was suspended for four months for “possessing” the knife!
His parents sued to get his suspension overturned — and lost! They appealed, but Judge Clyde H. Hamilton of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled federal courts cannot overturn local zero tolerance policies, even though he said the kid was “the victim of good intentions run amuck” — which is exactly what ZT is.
He ruled that “The panic over school violence has caused school officials to jettison the common sense idea that a person’s punishment should fit his crime,” but concluded that such policy changes are the job of the legislature, not the courts. Fisher’s reaction to that idea? “God save us all.” I don’t doubt He would be denied jurisdiction too.
– – –
Bad link? Broken image? Other problem on this page? Use the Help button lower right, and thanks.
This page is an example of my style of “Thought-Provoking Entertainment”. This is True is an email newsletter that uses “weird news” as a vehicle to explore the human condition in an entertaining way. If that sounds good, click here to open a subscribe form.
To really support This is True, you’re invited to sign up for a subscription to the much-expanded “Premium” edition:
Q: Why would I want to pay more than the minimum rate?
A: To support the publication to help it thrive and stay online: this kind of support means less future need for price increases (and smaller increases when they do happen), which enables more people to upgrade. This option was requested by existing Premium subscribers.
Ever notice when someone speaks to you in a foreign language that you don’t understand and can only shrug, thent they scream at you louder as though that will fix the situation?
Funny thing about human nature. Current policies/laws are not stopping all instances of violations.
Therefore, we MUST increase the penalties, even to the extreme point of locking people up and throwing away the key. THAT’LL show ’em!
There was a 1940’s-era cartoon in which a little kid was fantasizing about being the Great White Hunter in the Amazon fighting an indigent tribe. “I hated to kill them all but they had to be taught a lesson!” Understandable ‘logic’ from a 7-year-old, but guess where kids learn their logic skills.
To punish current offenders for all the combined offenses of earlier offenders displays more the impotence of the administrators than any logical handling of the offense itself.